Search for: "Ball v. Board of Bar Examiners" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2008, 11:57 pm
We especially focus on the abuse of the "character and fitness" process by the Michigan Board of Law Examiners and the Michigan Bar Association.In its report, the Character and Fitness Committee stated "We are concerned about providing a law license to someone who, even before he has handled his first case as a member of the bar, has effectively written off such a huge component of the justice system. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:32 am
" Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
After last week’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” The bar for originality is low; it requires only a “modicum of creativity. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
I’ve done so by first surveying §602 case law and then examining several of the defenses raised in actions involving consumer goods. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
– trade mark battle over GOLDEN BALLs between Intra-Presse and Golden Balls Limited (IPKat) Intellectual property standards: how do YOU behave? [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Even the most casual examination of corporate legal rules will find plenty of evidence that courts value preservation of the board’s decisionmaking authority. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Thermo-Ply (PATracer) Honeywell – Patentee appeals finding of patent invalidity under on-sale bar provisions of § 102(b): Honeywell v Nikon (PATracer) Nalco – Nalco appeals from grant of preliminary injunction against it from infringement patent directed to method of removing or transferring metals and/or amines from crude oil: Baker Hughes v Nalco (PATracer) Nutriset - Access to food now an IP issue? [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
[iii] So too has the plaintiffs’ bar recognized that cyber security breaches may become a lucrative addition to their class action litigation practices. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Lawrence Lessig ‘on the economics’: curse of the copyright holders (Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright Decisions District Court Massachusetts: Not much hope left – copyright claim time-barred, claim for unjust enrichment pre-empted: Jürek Zamoyski v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am by Kelly
Alliance Machine (Patently-O) CAFC affirms in Pass & Seymour appeal (2009-1338, -1369) (ITC Law Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False Claims Act does not bar multiple false marking suits: Simonian v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP)   Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office)  PricewaterhouseCooper report… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
The Court must be checking its crystal ball to figure out when that will happen. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Chairman of the Board of Cato Institute, Robert Levy. [read post]