Search for: "Ball v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 5:45 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Ball v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
A bit:The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in the case of Wright v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1316, [2003] UKHRR 76.Whether the US government will play ball is, of course, another matter entirely.How interesting to see that Guantánamo Bay leads to so much litigation even in countries other than the United States.The courts of the United States, in turn, would do well to note that their decisions are closely watched by many other judges around the world. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:38 am
Littman Krooks Roth & Ball v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
United States Dep't of Agriculture, 673 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:46 pm
The United States Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold the appellate court decision in Florida v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:51 am
Is there any meaningful distinction between legal sufficiency review under Jackson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2005, 11:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
A few terms back, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:21 am
Facts: This case (Patenaude v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am
Tomorrow, the first Monday in October, begins the new term of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
