Search for: "Ball v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
The appeal in the First Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm by Jack Goldsmith
Far from what Jack attributes to him, above, Johnson is reported only to claim that the United States can target ”combatants” of any group that has “aligned itself with al Qaeda against Americans. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:38 am by Stephanie Figueroa
§602(a)(1), allowed it to block importation of the wristwatches because it had not authorized those watches to be sold in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 11:07 am by William McGinley
  The statute is anything but clear, especially when viewed in the light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm by Peter Margulies
United States consular officials process millions of visa applications annually (see the State Department’s latest statistics here). [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for threatening statements he made on Facebook, dominated Court-related coverage and commentary. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Adam Chandler
Yesterday Senate Democrats were unable to break a Republican filibuster on the DISCLOSE Act, a legislative response to the Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, there is a point concerning the position in the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 4:09 pm
Moreover, Baden alleged that Molten imports its balls into the United States without marking the country of origin, constituting a misrepresentation of geographic origin. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
With the "Click Through" Nexus debate rounding third, Illinois threw the state and local tax ("SALT") community a curve ball with its ruling in Performance Marketing Association v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:03 pm
  Presumably the power exists partly to balance out the power of prosecutors gone wild, especially when they have gone wild on officers trying to carry out the foreign policy of the United States, albeit by way of cooking up a stupid story (apparently). [read post]