Search for: "Ball v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 1:00 pm
The United States, of course, should live up to its treaty commitments. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
A federal court can sometimes issue a writ of habeas corpus due to the violation of a federal statute in addition to the violation of the United States Constitution. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional… [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 7:32 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The word mark “WINNING ISN’T NORMAL” has also been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office with Registration No. 4630749 for printed matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  So said the United States Supreme Court today in Sexton v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:02 pm
DollOn Monday, July 6, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (minus Judge LouPLI Publishes 2009 Federal Circuit YearbookEach year, the Federal Circuit Yearbook provides a concise, comprehensive review of every patent dec Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court held, resolving a circuit court split and rejecting the EEOC’s guidance on the matter (Vance v Ball State University, June 24, 2013, Alito, S, Jr). [read post]