Search for: "Ball v. Wal-Mart, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 4:41 am by Heidi Henson
The Supreme Court’s denial of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes does not impact the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
One interpretation of the Wal-Mart decision may allow for the recognition of the parties’ right to have such discussions regarding most employment-related matters. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:06 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:41 am by Bruce Nye
  Here are a few glimpses of what’s new: Class Actions:  Those who do not themselves live under rocks already know that the US Supremes poleaxed the employment discrimination case against Wal-Mart Stores in  Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Metropolitan Opera, 841 N.E.2d 747, 749 (N.Y. 2005); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
(Patent Librarian's Notebook)   US Patent Reform Article: ‘Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009’ by Ed Reines and Nathan Greenblatt (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims)   US Patents Taxation of patent sales (IP Frontline) USPTO Office of PCT legal administration mailing list (Patent Docs) Summary of local patent rules affecting claim construction practice (Part 1 of 5) (Gray on Claims) Lawyer and neutral David Allgeyer on… [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118 (Ill. 2002) (actual knowledge of synergistic adverse effect of two drugs). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although the OFCCP claims this directive “clarifies” the information it is looking for in evaluating compensation, any OFCCP claims of transparency are “bogus” and the agency is “purposely trying to hide the ball,” Copus countered. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
(various citations and case-specific dates omitted).That started the ball rolling - at least for us.Not every New Jersey district court judge agreed with Thompson. [read post]