Search for: "Ballard v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2019, 5:50 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  Nick discussed the unit’s cooperation with federal regulators and other state regulators and its handling of various enforcement matters. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am by Leandra Lederman
A more recent example of a Tax Court violation of judicial norms was revealed by Ballard v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
You can catch us in October at the Garden State Council SHRM Conference and Expo. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am by Christine Corcos
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm by Ken White
The United States Department of Justice accused SG Interests of bid rigging, and SG Interests settled the case for $275,000. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm by Adam Levitin
 The CRA states that a rule may not "take effect," until the rule and its proposed effective date have been transmitted to Congress. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Nicholas Bellos
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court—in a case known as Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Fund v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, “as ‘good law,’ or ‘technically still on the books,’’’ stating: “No decent person can view the internment as any kind of ‘precedent’ for acceptable government behavior. [read post]