Search for: "Bancroft v. Bancroft" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2013, 11:44 am by Kevin Russell
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Maracich v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
The Bancroft Prize was rescinded and Emory University fired him. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 3:50 am by SHG
I mentioned this on the twitters and was told by a follower I respect that it went on to be inspirational, an exploration of human motivations and growth, greed v. fear v. life situations for people who had never been exposed to inhumanity. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, and representing the federal government and defending that power will be U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
The ruling aIso relied on a 1979 precedent, Nevada v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
” Her further explanation highlighted the fundamental issue of sovereign authority: The short decision in Hospital Diagnostic relies solely on a citation to Broida v Bancroft (103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]), a shareholder derivative action that did not involve a request for corporate dissolution. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
” Her further explanation highlighted the fundamental issue of sovereign authority: The short decision in Hospital Diagnostic relies solely on a citation to Broida v Bancroft (103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]), a shareholder derivative action that did not involve a request for corporate dissolution. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
” Her further explanation highlighted the fundamental issue of sovereign authority: The short decision in Hospital Diagnostic relies solely on a citation to Broida v Bancroft (103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]), a shareholder derivative action that did not involve a request for corporate dissolution. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
[Klamm], 205 AD2d 459 [1st Dept 1994]; Broida v Bancroft, 103 AD2d 88 [2d Dept 1984]; Tosi v Pastene & Co., 34 AD2d 520 [1st Dept 1970]). [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
Bancroft Davis, included a headnote in the official published version of the opinion saying the court had held corporations were covered by the 14th Amendment. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
Both Bancroft PLLC and Kirkland & Ellis can attribute multiple arguments to Paul Clement. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
Murphy of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, with twenty minutes of time. [read post]