Search for: "Bandemer v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
In Davis v Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
The justices further concluded that the Court should overrule Davis v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:17 am
Chavis and Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:22 am
First in Davis v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 am
Bandemer) or the First Amendment (Justice Kennedy's suggested alternative constitutional provision for assessing partisan gerrymandering claims in Vieth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Gill v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm
In so doing, the court overruled—without acknowledgement—a six-justice majority’s holding in Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, aptly described by the chief justice “as a Justice with extensive experience in state and local politics,” recognized this fact almost 40 years ago, writing in Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am
” In 1986, after years of confused and contradictory litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court affirmed the possibility of political-gerrymandering claims in Davis v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)Davis v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:44 pm
The Court first found these claims to be actionable in Davis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:27 am
The Court first found these claims to be actionable in Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
Bandemer: [T]here is good reason to think that political gerrymandering is a self-limiting enterprise. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Bandemer, although the court sidestepped an earlier opportunity to address the question in 1932 in Wood v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
In Davis v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Here’s the opening of Justice O’Connor’s separate opinion in Davis v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Karlan[1] On the eve of the Supreme Court’s hearing Davis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
Plaintiffs hoped it would eliminate the need for the difficult proof described in Davis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
Similarly, in the 1986 case of Davis v. [read post]
