Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 1,524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” the Treasury provided this explanation:The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For example, index funds that track the market may use currency benchmark rates in order to keep their returns in-line with the indices.5] While this may not sound like a particularly significant issue, even small fluctuations may impact these funds’ value. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:34 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  So jurisdiction in the case would be based not on effects within the United States -- an easier case for regulation, since U.S. investors would be involved -- but on conduct within the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Along this line, thinking about constitutional development at the state level should inspire us to consider more seriously the possibility that there is a substantial latent constituency for fundamental constitutional and political reform, an interest missed by those within the Beltway. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
Clement, Solicitor General for the Unites States Department of Justice filed an Amicus Brief on behalf of big business. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
§ 227 Unsolicited Advertisement     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:06 am by Amy Howe
In his brief in the Supreme Court, Percoco stresses that the court of appeals’ decision upholding his conviction relied on that court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:41 am by John Delaney and Monica Cai
If a web server located outside the United States hosts video content that can be viewed by Internet users located in the United States, does a public performance result under U.S. copyright law? [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
The conflicting earlier Court of Appeal decisions In United Bank Ltd. v ASIF (unreported 11 February 2000), it was held that a contract containing an anti-oral variation clause (“…No variation… shall be valid or effective unless made by one or more instruments in writing signed by the parties…”) could only be amended by a written document complying with that clause. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Attorney General United States, No. 19-1404 (3d Cir. 2020) Related posts: Fourth Circuit Rejects Anti-Spam Lawsuit–Omega World Travel v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:12 am
. - The United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Alice Corporation Pty. [read post]