Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 1,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2013, 9:04 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Illinois Supreme Court took an unexpected turn in its second civil decision of Friday morning, using State Bank of Cherry v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am by Ronald Mann
Dodd-Frank added a provision that says that such a  law is preempted “only if” it “prevents or significantly interferes with the exercise by the national bank of its powers,” and goes on to specify that courts are to apply “the legal standard for preemption in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank [v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:29 am by MBettman
The state failed to meet its burden that an alternate line of investigation was underway befo [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm by Deborah Heller
As part of the rollback of environmental regulations, the Trump Administration has finally completed their longed for repeal of the 2015 definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
National Australia Bank, the Supreme Court articulated what seemed to be a bright-line test for determining the extent to which the U.S. securities laws apply to transactions with international elements. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:03 pm
Well maybe we're about to find out.Patco Construction Company, Inc. v People's United Bank dba Ocean Bank, no pending in state court in Maine, may tell us just whose fault it really is, besides the cyber criminal of course.Patco was a long time customer of the bank but after losing hundreds of thousands of dollars from online theft and then getting a notice from the bank that they wanted Patco to pay it back, they decided they… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
The Bottom Line:  On June 23, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its second opinion in the Bank of New England bankruptcy cases, following up on its heavily debated 2004 ruling on the “Rule of Explicitness. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:47 am
The Bottom Line:  On June 23, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued its second opinion in the Bank of New England bankruptcy cases, following up on its heavily debated 2004 ruling on the “Rule of Explicitness. [read post]