Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am by Adam Feldman
United States, which dealt with criminal bank fraud. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:43 am by Greg
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently went to great lengths to explain how it came to decision with a different result than the United States Supreme Court in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” the Treasury provided this explanation:The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
David Banks Media law has a post “Contempt of Court and the challenge of social media”. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As described below, state, federal and international breach notification laws arguably do not apply to ransomware attacks because no corporate data is actually pilfered. [read post]