Search for: "Bank Line v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2019, 12:43 pm
CLS Bank/Mayo v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
PPD-28 is binding on the executive branch, however, and codifies the long-standing historical policy of the United States to collect intelligence in order to allow the government to make decisions concerning “foreign, defense and economic policy, and the protection of United States national interests from foreign security threats,” while drawing the line at aiding private corporations. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
The Court however, made short shrift of that argument by stating that the bank was allowed to modify the terms. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
Sales taxes – Tax law allows you to deduct your local and state sales taxes. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
Kopf Senior United States District Jud [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:50 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
United States, which dealt with criminal bank fraud. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:25 am
Yesterday, our friends in the United States Supreme Court issued the decision in Lorenzo v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:43 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recently went to great lengths to explain how it came to decision with a different result than the United States Supreme Court in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
” the Treasury provided this explanation:The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
David Banks Media law has a post “Contempt of Court and the challenge of social media”. [read post]
