Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 1,504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am by MOTP
The Court however, made short shrift of that argument by stating that the bank was allowed to modify the terms. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:40 am by Ronald Mann
Bank of the United States, to Holmes in American Well Works v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:30 am
Billing, the United States Supreme Court held that antitrust laws do not apply to certain areas subject to SEC regulation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, 24 (or 12.7%) of the 2009 securities lawsuit filings involved companies that are domiciled outside the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:31 am
The Bottom Line: The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (the “BAP”) affirmed that a creditor failed to show cause to change the vote of a purchased claim in order to prevent the “cramdown” of a plan in a single-asset bankruptcy. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Pierce United States District Court for C.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:02 pm
National Australia Bank, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit limited the ability of U.S. courts to hear claims brought on behalf of non-U.S. investors who purchased shares of non-U.S. companies on non-U.S. exchanges. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 4:56 am by Jani
Finally the matter arrived in the open arms of the United States Supreme Court, which issued is ruling on the question a bit over a month ago (discussion of the earlier decision can be found here).The case of Alice Corporation v CLS Bank International dealt with Alice Corporation's patented method of mitigating 'settlement risk', which is the uncertainty of whether only one party will pay what it owes to another, by the use of a third-party. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
NAB’s registration statement in the United States, for example, pertained to “ordinary shares” (At page 58 of the Supplemental Joint Appendix in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am by Barbara Shreero
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 1:58 pm by Martin H. Orlick
In a unanimous published opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of Whitaker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm by BLOG
People's United Bank d/b/a Ocean Bank, filed in state court in Maine, tees up this very question for resolution.Patco alleges that it has been a customer of Ocean Bank. [read post]