Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 1,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 7:54 am by John Elwood
  Justice Scalia loves bright lines, so unsurprisingly, the opinion began with a very muscular restatement of the traditional presumption that legislation enacted by Congress is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, unless a contrary intent appears. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:17 am
" Specifically, it held that (1) section 1748.9 "does not preclude national banks from exercising their authority to lend money on personal security under section 24 of Title 12 of the United States Code (Seventh)" and (2) "without a factual record," it could not conclude that section 1748.9 "significantly impairs national banks' authorized activities. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Lauren E. Quigley
On Monday, November 18, 2019, the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (“OCC”) announced that it is seeking public comment on a proposed rule to clarify the “valid when made” doctrine in the wake of a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Madden v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:11 am by Ingrid Wuerth
In Nelson, the plaintiff was recruited in the United States to work for a state-run Saudi Hospital. [read post]
12 May 2021, 2:58 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletin United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:15 am by David Markus
That was Justice Ginsburg after she was referred to as Justice O'Connor during an oral argument today in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:48 am by Broc Romanek
Instead, the Court adopted a bright-line "transactional test"--"whether the purchase or sale is made in the United States, or involves a security listed on a domestic exchange. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am by Ashby Jones
That leaves the one factual claim in Obama's brief reference to the decision: the age of the law the court voided in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Despite lots of its own inconsistency, the Supreme Court adopted this view in 1866 in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm by Phil Cave
in United States v. [read post]