Search for: "Bank of New York v. Bright"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
The regulation preempted state enforcement of consumer protection laws against national banks and grew out of subpoenas issued by the New York attorney general. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
Professor Barry Friedman’s opinion piece in the New York Times on Jones is characteristically insightful: we’ve featured his work in our Bright Ideas series and other posts. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:14 am
[DealBook / New York Times] * DLA Piper’s future’s so bright it’s got to wear shades — and appoint a new co-managing partner in New York City, its largest office. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:02 am
Jul 02, 2009) (NO. 979 989 06)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne Gantt of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:05 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKContractsTruck Dealer's Breach Claims Arising From GM's Refusal to Aid Car Franchise Acquisition Rejected Bright Bay GMC Truck Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:35 pm
Lower federal courts, principally the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), have already cited Morrison to dismiss multiple Sec. 10(b) cases with a transnational element. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:25 am
Genovese "The facts here present an exception to Painter's bright-line rule and the proper date for the end of the marriage for equitable distribution of plaintiff's pension is the date of his New York divorce action, not the date of his later New Jersey complaint. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
So, I’m sitting in a classroom at New York Law School, attending Max Gardner’s UCC-focused seminar. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
When I first read David Streitfeld’s article headline: “Homes at Risk, and No Help From Lawyers,” which ran on December 20th, in The New York Times I thought… Wow, well it’s about time… maybe someone’s finally gotten it. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am
Gundlach v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm
The holding company operated out of New York, where the allegedly false statements were made. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
However, the appellate court noted that a number of other factors were not sufficient to establish territoriality, including that the investments were marketed in the United States and sold to customers based in the United States, investors were instructed to wire funds to a bank in New York, and the custodian of the fund was a New York securities firm. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
In contrast, the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), the New York Human Rights Law (NYHRL) and the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) all have significantly broader definitions of the term “disability” including relatively minor mental and physical impairments. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:51 am
Scientific-Atlanta Inc. of 2008 and Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:31 am
CARPENTER V. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 9:57 am
Good News The report also highlights four bright spots that surfaced during the year in: Wage and Hour Litigation: The California Supreme Court in Duran v. [read post]
