Search for: "Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
  U.S authorities might also serve a subpoena on a foreign bank witness by relying on In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Bank of Nova Scotia), 740 F.2d 817 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1106 (1985). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
While the Tsige decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal isn't binding on Nova Scotia courts, common law principles, and the statutory obligations would be the same in Ontario and Nova Scotia. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm by Barry Sookman
Canada-Nova-Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board, 2014 FC 450 Denturist Group of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 2:49 pm by Andrew Keane Woods, Peter Swire
  In other words, it codifies the so-called Bank of Nova Scotia standard—the standard, developed in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The “intrusion upon seclusion” tort has since been recognized, at least provisionally, in other Canadian jurisdictions such as Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Doucette v Nova Scotia 2016 NSSC 25, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia awarded damages of Can$50,000 for defamation by a government employee. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
He found that courts in Alberta and Nova Scotia had approved litigation funding agreements, albeit without explanation. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States The mother of a popular YouTube personality sued a woman for defamation Tuesday, alleging she defamed the plaintiff on Instagram and published private information, including her address. [read post]