Search for: "Bank v. Cooper" Results 101 - 120 of 1,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 6:19 am
Contents include:Niels Blokker, General Introduction Marie-Clotide Runavot, The Intergovernmental Organization and the Institutionalization of International Relations: The Modelling of International Organization at Stake Angela Di Stasi, About Soft International Organizations: An Open Question Piero Pennetta, International Regional Organizations: Problems and Issues Alessandro Polsi, Universalism and Regionalism in the History of the United Nations and of Specialized Agencies Giovanni Cellamare,… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by admin
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK: EFFECTS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES With the decision in Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:39 pm by Neil Cahn
Such was the holding of the Appellate Division, First Department, in its January 3, 2013 decision in Nederlander v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Union itself is a fund manager and member of a cooperative of financial institutions, consisting almost entirely of banks (see here, in German) and two of its main shareholders are banks, namely DZ Bank AG and WGZ Bank AG. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:45 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AR, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 857 (26 July 2011) Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862 (26 July 2011) Rust Consulting Ltd v PB Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 899 (26 July 2011) Destiny 1 Ltd v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 831 (26 July 2011) MH (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:16 pm
That order left intact a Seventh Circuit Court decision rejecting that claim, in the most closely watched of a series of similar court challenges -- the case of Cooper v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 7:04 am by John Jascob
Two of Bhardwaj’s friends were also charged, and an additional two defendants have separately pleaded guilty and are cooperating with the government (SEC v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:45 pm by Joy Waltemath
Though a refusal to cooperate in an interview, veiled threats, and a belief that the employee was the aggressor in an altercation with a coworker were non-discriminatory reasons for termination, the appeals court also found a question of fact on the legitimacy of the bank’s stated reasons and therefore on pretext. [read post]