Search for: "Banks v. Jones (INMATE 1)" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Our next new relist is Jones v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:39 am by Jay Willis
City of Chicago, Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Jones, No. 07-2052 Sentence is affirmed where defendant pled guilty to charges stemming from her role in a bank fraud conspiracy. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Lee, No. 06-3438 A sentence for various counts of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in running several of the aggravated identity theft counts consecutively to each other; and 2) all of defendant's other issues on appeal were barred by his plea agreement or outside the scope of a remand order, and thus were barred. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Santos, No. 060833 Conviction for murder while engaging in a drug offense is affirmed where: 1) because some drug conspiracies in violation of 21 U.S.C. section 846 are "punishable under" section 841(b)(1)(A), criminal liability under section 848(e)(1)(A) requires no active involvement in drug distribution; 2) the nexus between a murder and a drug offense need not be more than the "substantive connection" described in US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
P. 26.2 and 16(a)(1)(F) mandate discovery of statements and polygraph results, respectively. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
U.S., No. 07-1678, 07-1679 Grant of writ of error coram nobis to inmate petitioner, which vacated petitioner's original sentence on the grounds that ten years earlier the court had illegally sentenced him to life imprisonment, is reversed where: 1) the substance of the petition falls under U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 In re Sims, No. 06-0644 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force, inmate's petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring him to produce his mental health records is granted because: 1) a plaintiff does not forfeit the psychotherapist-patient privilege merely by asserting a claim for injuries that do not include emotional damage, or by stating that he suffers from… [read post]