Search for: "Banks v. Sellers"
Results 1 - 20
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2014, 12:59 am
Reed Smith (Charles Weller) recently acted for the successful Respondents in Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA [2013] EWCA Civ 1679. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
Yesterday, the Delaware Chancery Court rejected a seller’s claims that it was entitled to cash held in the target’s bank account that it neglected to withdraw prior to the closing of its sale of the target’s stock. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:36 am
The Claimant Buyers brought proceedings against the Defendant Bank under refund guarantees issued by the Bank in support of two shipbuilding contracts between the Buyers and Sellers. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:36 am
The Claimant Buyers brought proceedings against the Defendant Bank under refund guarantees issued by the Bank in support of two shipbuilding contracts between the Buyers and Sellers. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am
Lord Clarke went on to opine that subrogation to the unpaid vendor’s lien was the appropriate remedy to be deployed: “The answer is that the Bank is subrogated to the unpaid seller’s lien. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm
Ashkenazi v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:56 pm
Larger institutional sellers (e.g., banks) will attempt to prevent some of these unexpected delays by contracting to convey title under a seemingly less stringent standard in order to get their deals closed in the shortest amount of time possible. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
See Mateer v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:56 pm
Larger institutional sellers (e.g., banks) will attempt to prevent some of these unexpected delays by contracting to convey title under a seemingly less stringent standard in order to get their deals closed in the shortest amount of time possible. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
He stated that the appropriate equitable remedy was that the Bank is subrogated to the unpaid seller’s lien as this will reinstate the appellant’s liability under the charge and allow the bank to enforce its equitable interest in the property by sale. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:00 am
While not claiming strict liability in tort, the plaintiff in Garcia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
In Canada’s first Covid-19 busted deal case, Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc. v Duo Bank of Canada, (Ont. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:51 am
Mr Carlyle had to complete the construction of a new house on the plot by a specified date and the purchase was subject to a buy-back clause allowing the seller to re-purchase the plot if that construction was not completed on time. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:41 am
In Oppenheim v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:56 am
Bank National Association v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
See Amend v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:02 am
Bank of New York Mellon Corp., 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am
Four banks—Bank of America Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company, Citigroup, Inc. and PNC Financial Services—would each receive about $150 million from the compensation fund payment to invest, the plaintiffs’ lawyers in Keepseagle v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 4:22 pm
In Iscavo Avocados v. [read post]
