Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 13,985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2025, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank & Trust Co., 11 NY3d 146, 158 [2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Marmelstein v Kehillat New Hempstead: The Rav Aron Jofen Community Synagogue, 11 NY3d 15, 21 [2008]). [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 4:24 am by Peter A. Mahler
At case inception the petitioner applied for temporary and preliminary injunctive relief enjoining the respondent from making any further menu changes and restoring petitioner’s access to the LLC’s banking and other accounts. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
In R (Leger) v Secretary of State for Education [2025] EWHC 665 (Admin), Ms Gladwys Leger was a teacher at Bishop Justus Church of England School [5]. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 5:45 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Moreover, throughout this period, Israel conducted a severe escalation of violence and displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 7:36 am by Jessica Statler
This proposed legislation is now under consideration in the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:29 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Absa Bank Limited v Joubert High Court of SA Free State Division Case No 3952/2024 (27 February 2025) [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 10:00 pm by Sophia Tang
Antitrust claims are not subject to state choice-of-law rules. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
I have been detailed to work on issues related to funds and asset managers at the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Labor, and the Senate Banking Committee. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
At the colloquium, several scholars reported that some jurisdictions in the world – and some U.S. states – allow for a more moderate and permissive interpretation of fiduciary duties. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by Karson Taylor
  Despite the fact that sexual harassment protections are now considered essential in discussions of employment discrimination, workplace sexual harassment was not recognized as a violation of Title VII until 1986, when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]