Search for: "Banks v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 7,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2016, 10:05 am by Ellen Podgor
United States rejected defendant's argument that section 1344(1) "does not apply to him because he intended to cheat only a bank depositor, not a bank. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:29 am
Today the Sixth Circuit handed down a case on probable cause to search a home based in large part on a subscription to a child pornography website: United States v. [read post]
The Turkish state-owned commercial bank alleges that the United States “government wants this case to be the worlds first [criminal trial of a foreign-sovereign instrumentality]. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:42 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] that a defendant's argument that he should not be convicted of bank fraud because because he only intended to cheat a bank depositor is unpersuasive. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am by Yishai Schwartz
Doctrinally, Bank Markazi’s argument was based on a 19th Century precedent, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:30 am by Seth
, Minneapolis-based US Bank is headed for trial in United States District Court in Texas (E.D. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:35 pm by Eliot Kim
The act must have occurred outside the United States, but must be an act that would have violated federal or state law if it were committed in the United St [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that prosecution under the federal government's anti-bank fraud statute [text] does not require proof that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]