Search for: "Barber v. Municipal Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Workers' Compensation Board’s granting an award for a work-related injury does not, "by operation of collateral estoppel,” automatically entitle the claimant to General Municipal Law §207-c benefitsJackson v Barber, 2015 NY Slip Op 08025, Appellate Division, Third Department Lawrence Jackson, diagnosed with plantar fasciitis* in his left foot while working as a correction officer for the Cortland County Sheriff's Department, filed an… [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:35 am
Barber, the court engages in what might be called appellate nullification. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:51 am
Hat tip to the RLUIPA Defense Blog for this posting: http://www.rluipa-defense.com The District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, in Tree of Life Christian Schools v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
This morning the court hears argument in one case, Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:03 am
Third, consider Zarda v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Barber, No. 17-7915 Civil (C.P. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:41 pm
Barber Asphalt Paving (1906) and San Remo Hotel v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
We also affirm the district court's decisions on each of the defendant's six cross-appeals. 07a0291p.06 2007/08/02 Barber v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
Subscription needed for online access:
STATE DECISIONS:
Barber v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
District court: Ah, but the plaintiff can't sue the municipality unless he shows a pattern of mistreatment. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:49 am
Still, as the Supreme Court recognized in Jacobson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Way back in 1983, in Bearden v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Barber v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
In Brady v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1873, in Bradwell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Another key, too-often neglected transparency issue: Former Harris County DA Johnny Holmes and the Texas Supreme Court, abetted by the Legislature after the fact, gutted the Law Enforcement exception (Govt Code 552.108) to the Public Information Act in Holmes v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:25 pm
In Antonyuk v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
.
A1485
Gunther (MS) -- Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for lifeSUMM : Amd SS168-h & 168-o, Cor L Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for life. 01/09/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA1531
Benjamin -- Provides guidelines for evaluating applications for barbers and cosmetology license where applicant has prior criminal recordSUMM : Amd SS434 & 438, Gen Bus L Provides that persons who have a criminal record… [read post]
