Search for: "Barber v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm by Richard D. Friedman
(That doesn’t mean there are none; if the state knows where a witness is and ihttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gift can invoke a formal procedure to secure her presence, then it should do so; this is Barber v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:11 pm
Barber and attorneys Joyner and McSurely, and shared the above passages with them for comment. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:48 am
Opportunity to cross-examination witnesses a critical element to due process in quasi-judicial administrative proceedings Barber v New York State Off. of Victim Servs, 2013 NY Slip Op 00958, Appellate Division, Third Department An individual [Applicant] installed certain security and surveillance devices in response to alleged stalking and harassment the Applicant had experienced. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:07 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gibson & Ors v Sheffield City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 63 (10 February 2010) Green v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 64 (10 February 2010) Online Catering Ltd v Acton & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 58 (10 February 2010) Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien [2010] EWCA Civ 66 (10 February 2010) Bascetta & Anor v Abbey National Plc [2010] EWCA Civ… [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
  Barber and Fleming are Dworkinian critics of originalism. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 7:56 am by Randall Hodgkinson
William Barber, Jr., No. 106,911 (Cherokee)Direct appeal (petition for review); Aggravated batteryMichelle A. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Delahanty, 129 F.3d 20, 26 (1st Cir. 1997)(holding courthouses, particularly courtrooms, are nonpublic forums); United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court in” Espinoza v. [read post]