Search for: "Barclay v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
On June 25, 2014, New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a Complaint naming defendants Barclays PLC and Barclays Capital Inc.with fraud arising from the operation of a dark pool and other attendant electronic trading practices. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK By ERIC T. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 3:25 am
Barclays Agrees to Pay $2 Billion in Civil Penalties to Resolve Claims for Fraud in the Sale of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities /Two Former Barclays Executives Agree to Pay $2 Million to Resolve Claims Brought Against Them Individually (DOJ Press Release)https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/barclays-agrees-pay-2-billion-civil-penalties-resolve-claims-fraud-sale-residential-mortgageIn the United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am by CMS
Alaina Wadsworth, Chris Horsefield and Ben Brown, who all work within the Insurance & Reinsurance Group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this month, in the matter of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13: Earlier this month, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the matter of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm by Benjamin Carafiol
Barclay; the Court may simply wish to instruct all states to uniformly follow the approach used in Virginia and the majority of other states. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
I am sure that the possible effect of the Morrison v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan Moss
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that   (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii)… [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 6:52 pm
Barclays) had been dismissed by the district court following the Supreme Court's decision in Sosa v. [read post]