Search for: "Barclay v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2008, 1:18 am
NYS Division of Human Rights
KINGS COUNTYMotor Vehicles
City Rules Supersede State Law; Federal Express Fails to Show Double Parking for Delivery, Pickup
Yavkina v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Lester Smith v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:42 am
Gelboim v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
On February 24, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Jerry Dillon, et al. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 12:44 pm
Limelight Networks, and Mckesson Tech v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:21 am
Barclay stated the following: [W]e believe it is consistent with the statute’s purpose to pay a contingency fee, which may be greater than an hourly fee. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
The Internet Cases Blog has published there articles covering significant recent cases in the United States: A summary judgment was recently awarded in favour of Chanel following the luxury brands challenge to the registrant of the domain name <chanelgraffitti.com>. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
Here's an excerpt from the Berkman Center press release: The Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Public Citizen, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the court to apply First Amendment scrutiny to the recently resurgent “hot news misappropriation” doctrine in Barclays Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
Here's an excerpt from the Berkman Center press release: The Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Public Citizen, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the court to apply First Amendment scrutiny to the recently resurgent “hot news misappropriation” doctrine in Barclays Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:42 am
The Court’s reasoning It was clear from the authorities (Abnett v British Airways Plc [1997] A.C. 430 and Barclay v British Airways Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1419) that the Montreal Convention had exclusivity in domestic law. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
60
A724
Gottfried (MS) -- Provides clarification regarding retaliation against a patient or a patient's legal representative for asserting such patient's right of action BLURB : Pub Heal. retaliation v. patient Last Act: 06/09/09 signed chap.6061
A763
Gottfried (MS) -- Provides clarification on the private right of action by a patient of a residential health care facility BLURB : Pub Heal. right of action Last Act:… [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:44 am
The merit decision in State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Jesner v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Mississippi; (2) whether the Florida Supreme Court’s per se harmless-error rule for Hurst violations contravenes the Supreme Court’s decisions holding that harmless-error review cannot be “automatic and mechanical,” Barclay v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
Barclays Am. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:08 am
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm
” (source) Not surprisingly, this "sweat of the brow" logic is reminiscent of the reasoning in Judge Cote's influential decision in Barclays v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:20 am
Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes that the recent decision in Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
