Search for: "Barclay v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
Lord Justice Sales, who delivered the main judgment, was guided by the reasoning of the House of Lords in Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank plc [2006] UKHL 28, which determined that a defendant’s duty of compliance is owed to the court, of which the remedy for non-compliance is punishment for contempt, not civil damages. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:35 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions Department for Education v Molyneux [2012] EWCA Civ 193 (28 February 2012) Independent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 195 (28 February 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tuncel & Anor [2012] EWHC 402 (Admin) (28 February 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions Barclay Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Ors… [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 7:53 am by David Snyder
The parties are submitting briefs and the case - Goldstein et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Gene Quinn
In May of 2017, the United States Supreme Court delivered a unanimous decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:35 am
The following commentary is from Michael Barclay of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:13 am by sally
Supreme Court The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 (08 December 2010) Progress Property Company Ltd v Moorgarth Group Ltd [2010] UKSC 55 (08 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) A v B & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1378 (08 December 2010) Perrins v Holland & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1398 (08 December 2010) Tilianu, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and… [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Court grants review of two cases, likely to be among the term’s more important for business, to clarify the limits of state court personal jurisdiction when none of defendants’ actions relevant to the dispute took place in the state [Jim Beck on Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
There was a comment on the blog which stated: "No-one ever said TSM was dead".A comment by LBE included:My reference to the words of Michael Barclay was merely to give one example to negate the statement "No-one ever said TSM was dead".Further discussion is on the IPBiz post titled The TSM test after KSR v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As reflected here, notwithstanding concurrent state court jurisdiction in the ’33 Act, the Luther v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Everclear Ltd (BVI) v Agrest & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 232 (09 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Abdi [2011] EWCA Civ 242 (09 March 2011) Pitt & Anor v Holt & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 197 (09 March 2011) North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings, Inc & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 230 (09 March 2011) Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 241 (09 March 2011) Nunn… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Brunson, Addressing Hate: Georgia, the IRS, and the Ku Klux Klan, (July 31, 2020).Tanner Bean & Robin Fretwell Wilson, The Administrative State as a New Front in the Culture War: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:50 am by sally
Supreme Court Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2011] UKSC 5 (1 February 2011) ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Steed v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 75 (01 February 2011) Barclay & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 32 (01 February 2011) Hereworth v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 74 (01 February 2011) Welsh v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 73 (01… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Barclays Mercantile Business Finance v Mawson (2004): Living with UncertaintyJohn Vella19. [read post]