Search for: "Barclay v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 10:20 am by Steve Harms
  This generally means the debtor (at least in Michigan, and the practice does vary a bit from state to state, country to country) is handed the document. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States Hon. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:20 am by Steve Harms
  This generally means the debtor (at least in Michigan, and the practice does vary a bit from state to state, country to country) is handed the document. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am by CMS
Damages were sought by the claimant for breach of an implied duty owed by the bank to its customers, as explained in Barclays Bank plc v Quincecare Ltd [1992] 4 All E.R. 363. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:07 am
MetLife, Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 359, 834 N.Y.S.2d 494 (2007), which gave employers an absolute privilege against defamation claims for the content of Form U5 filings, were recently dealt a blow by the New York State Supreme Court's decision in Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by John Mikhail
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]