Search for: "Barclay v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
United States Gawker Media has filed for bankruptcy after losing the Hulk Hogan invasion-of-privacy case. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:42 am
Gelboim v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
She discussed the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:50 am
Barclay v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
Douglas, prepared the famous case, Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:37 pm
” Earlier this month, in Braman v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard on 6-7 March 2015. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
Decision at First Instance Considering both a narrow approach (based on rules from Buhr & Ors v Barclays Bank Plc [2001] EWCA Civ 1223) and a wider approach (based on Banque Financière De La Cité v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am
Shortly before the website went live, the Respondent, “H”, opened two bank accounts, one with Lloyds and the other with Barclays. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am
Electric Power Supply Association, and EnerNOC Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Five weeks ago, a decision was published dealing with a worker who had a severe hand injury (Barclay v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
On February 24, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Jerry Dillon, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:44 pm
EFF Files Amicus Brief on Behalf of Tech Pioneers in Oracle v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
: 3-16177Case filed: September 29, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 29, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-115 In the Matter of Barclays Capital Inc.Administrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
