Search for: "Barclay v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 4:32 pm by Kit Walsh
Files: tveyes_sj_opinion.pdfRelated Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceDigital VideoRelated Cases: Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.comAuthors Guild v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK By ERIC T. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in  R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that   (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii)… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Barclay & Anor) v SSJ and Lord Chancellor & Ors, heard 30 June 2014. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Barclay & Anor) v SSJ and Lord Chancellor & Ors, heard 30 June 2014. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am by Barbara Shreero
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (This is sounding a lot like Barclays Capital v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Also, Barclays and UBS have reportedly hired criminal defense lawyers to represent employees with regard to the investigations.[15]   For the most part, the regulators that have made public statements about the investigations have only stated that the investigations remain in the early stages. [read post]