Search for: "Barker v. Barker" Results 81 - 100 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:48 am by INFORRM
On 30 July 2021, Saini J handed down judgment on the Defendant’s strike-out application in Warren v DSG Retail Limited [2021] EWHC 2168 (QB). [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
For an apt and very current illustration of the serious difficulties which arise when the boundary between the two is not recognised, it is worth taking time to read the judgment of Mr Justice Julian Knowles in Miller v The College of Policing & Another. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:54 am
But I also wanted to thank everyone who helped with the case: Cam Barker of YetterColeman LLP, who is also about to start work as Deputy SG in the Texas Solicitor General’s office. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:24 am by John Diekman
  In pleading conversion, the plaintiff must allege legal ownership or an immediate right of possession to specifically identifiable funds and that the defendant exercised an unauthorized dominion over such funds to the exclusion of the plaintiff's rights.The mere right to payment cannot be the basis for the claim since the essence of a conversion cause of action is the unauthorized dominion over the thing in question.Student note:  To make a claim for conversion, tangible… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:03 am by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman and Jonathan Barker On December 21, 2011, a California Court of Appeal held in Aleman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"The New Statesman reviews Juliet Barker's England, Arise: the People, the King, and the Great Revolt of 1381 (Little, Brown). [read post]