Search for: "Barker v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The justices have agreed to decide the following issue: “Whether district courts, in determining whether the due process clause requires a state or local government to provide a post-seizure probable-cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial-forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should apply the “speedy trial” test employed in United States v. $8,850 and Barker v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
And the correct test to determine whether that has occurred, the state insists, is the one that the lower court applied in this case: the “speedy trial” test outlined in Barker v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:25 am by Mavrick Law Firm
For example, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in WeRide Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
", 24 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 1-28 (2022).Ariel Dulitzky, Rereading Cain and Abel: New Approaches to Enforced Disappearances, 44 Human Rights Quarterly 659-703 (2022).Reports:Center for Religion, Culture and Democracy, Religious Liberty in the States. 2023. [read post]
United States, saying, “In particular, ‘the right to criticize public men’ is ‘[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship. [read post]