Search for: "Barker v. Wingo"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
Brillon, No. 08-88, in which the Supreme Court revisited Barker v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:21 pm
Absent a systemic breakdown in a state public defender system, delays caused by appointed counsel are not attributed to the state for purposes of Barker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:28 am
The state appealed arguing that the district judge had failed to take into account all of the Barker v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decision of Barker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
WINGO, 407 U.s. 514 (1972) AND DOGGETT v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
Barker v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:45 pm
VI); see Barker v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 8:23 pm
Wingo‘s prejudice factor to weigh in his favor. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:02 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) and Doggett v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
Finally, the dissent applied the four-factor test set forth in Barker v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:56 pm
Wingo test. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court in Barker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
In Jones, the Seventh Circuit - following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. $8,850 - applied the speedy trial test from Barker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Supreme Court decision of Barker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Bissell, 866 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1989), which held that a defendant is only entitled to such a hearing if he meets the Barker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Barker v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm
Eldridge or the test employed in Barker v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:15 pm
” CGCCA applied the four Moreno/Barker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:26 pm
Wingo. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:06 am
This claim is analyzed under the four-factor balancing test set forth in Barker v Wingo, 407 US 514 (1972). [read post]