Search for: "Barker v. Wingo"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm
Wingo or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
And the correct test to determine whether that has occurred, the state insists, is the one that the lower court applied in this case: the “speedy trial” test outlined in Barker v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:16 pm
Wingo, 407 U. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
Wingo, 407 U. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 2:40 am
Justifying his decision to file the motion, Fleischman cited the 1972 case Barker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:57 am
Supreme Court established a four-part test for evaluating speedy trial claims in 1972’s Barker v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 pm
Wingo. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:11 pm
See Barker v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am
Applying the four-factor test from Barker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
Analyzing his claim under the four-factor balancing test set forth in Barker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
Barker v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:45 pm
VI); see Barker v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:11 am
In Barker v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 8:23 pm
Wingo‘s prejudice factor to weigh in his favor. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:12 pm
VI; Barker v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm
” In a short concurrence, Justice Sotomayor writes that “the Barker [v. [read post]
