Search for: "Barker v. Wingo" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
The Court applied the analytical framework as articulated in Barker v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). [read post]
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible witnesses available for his defense.3. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
The Court then considered the four-factor test set out in Barker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:21 am
The Court must also apply the four-part test articulated in Barker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:35 pm
In applying the second Barker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:54 pm
AFCCA then subjected the delay to the four-part Moreno/Barker v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 8:26 am by Rory Little
”  But Justices Breyer and Sotomayor both suggested that, if the state got this factor in the Barker v. [read post]