Search for: "Barker v. Wingo"
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 2:46 am
Lydia Krebs won in State v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:45 pm
The Court concluded that although this is a close call, under the factors of Barker v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
Wingo, 407 U. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
Brillon, No. 08-88, in which the Supreme Court revisited Barker v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:21 pm
Absent a systemic breakdown in a state public defender system, delays caused by appointed counsel are not attributed to the state for purposes of Barker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:35 pm
In applying the second Barker v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
On appeal, the Vermont Supreme Court applied the four-part test set out in Barker v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
Barker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:54 pm
AFCCA then subjected the delay to the four-part Moreno/Barker v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:56 pm
Wingo test. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
The Court applied the analytical framework as articulated in Barker v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
So the first of the four Moreno/Barker v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 12:40 am
Unlike when applying the fourth Moreno/Barker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
Barker v. [read post]
31 May 2008, 12:55 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 3:27 am
There's nothing especially groundbreaking here legally speaking, a straight forward, fact intensive application of the Barker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:21 am
The Court must also apply the four-part test articulated in Barker v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:45 pm
But NMCCA concludes that the final two Barker v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). [read post]
