Search for: "Barlow v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
After mentioning a number of authorities, it stated that the test of dishonesty was that clearly explained by Lord Hoffman in Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37 at [10]: [emphasis added] Although a dishonest state of mind is a subjective mental state, the standard by which the law determines whether it is dishonest is objective. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm by Holly Brezee
By: Ben Barlow  [4/11/22] In what is becoming an exciting copyright lawsuit season, Federal Judge Jeffrey S. [read post]
Civil proceedings have, since 1995, advocated this exclusively  objective test (Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 164, confirmed by Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by James Maxeiner
To the relief of many, last year in Turner v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
In Australia the patentability of such materials has recently been confirmed by the Federal Court of Australia in Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics Inc [2013] FCA 65 (15 February 2013)[3], see Vaughn Barlow, CIPA, March 2013, 122-123. [read post]