Search for: "Barnes v. House" Results 1 - 20 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
Justice Scarth, in Maxim v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
The Board heard no evidence to contradict that position.Therefore, notwithstanding the eloquence of the [O] brothers and their expert, the Board was not shown how the barn could now trigger the MDS process – or that it ever could.Read the decision at: O’Brien v Laronde. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:06 am by sally
Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Court of Appeal “A local planning authority could not bring enforcement proceedings against the unlawful construction of a dwelling house on a farm in breach of planning permission which was granted for the purpose of erecting a barn. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 8:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
On December 11, 2014, Perschbacher applied to the county for a CUP to construct on the land a barn capable of housing 2,490 swine. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
Tony Gardner, the operator of the Festival of Fears, submitted an application to operate a haunted house inside a pole barn on Thorpe Farm; however, the permit was denied because the barn was less than 150 feet from Stoneybrook Road, which would require a zoning variance as set forth in an October 2007 Amendment to the Joint Municipal Zoning Ordinance (“JMZO”). [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 12:31 pm
October 30, 2008): [*P15] More importantly, even if Barnes had not consented, the deputies still would have been allowed to look inside the house for Scott because they had an active arrest warrant for Scott and a reasonable belief that he lived in the house. [read post]