Search for: "Barnes v. Department of Revenue"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
And this facial approach is rooted in longstanding precedent: In Police Department of Chicago v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
”[20] These operations hurt governments, who lose out on revenue; consumers, because the products often don’t adhere to health standards; legal businesses, which cannot compete with illicit products; and the general respect of the law. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
In this Iredell Co. case, a thirteen-year-old juvenile was brought to the Sheriff’s Department for an interview regarding the sexual abuse of his nine-year-old cousin. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
He cited recent data breaches at Barnes and Noble bookstores, Dickey’s Barbecue Pit and fintech company Robinhood Markets as evidence that such a standard is needed. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Montana Department of Revenue, Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am
For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
Greg Stohr reports at Bloomberg that in CIS Services, the court “agreed to review a ruling that critics say would give the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service a sweeping shield from challenges to their regulations. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
” At The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[a]t the Justice Department, whose attorneys will take part in nine of the 10 scheduled arguments, the pleas will be made to a speakerphone in the solicitor general’s conference room,” and the advocates “will still be wearing morning coats, the formal, traditional dress for government lawyers who argue before the court. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:10 pm
On May 23, 2019, United States Attorneys filed a Grand Jury Indictment, United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:37 am
Chapter VIII (“Of the King’s Revenue”) 4. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
The trial judge, Justice Barnes, ruled that the browsewrap terms in issue were not binding on Ms Marsden. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:47 am
If oral argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:07 am
Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, heard 24 – 25 February 2014. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, heard 24 – 25 February 2014. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am
Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, heard 24 – 25 February 2014. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, heard 24 – 25 February 2014. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, heard 24 – 25 February 2014. [read post]
