Search for: "Barnes v. House"
Results 1 - 20
of 440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
Justice Scarth, in Maxim v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:57 pm
By Eric Goldman Barnes v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
Freer v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
Appellant also argued that under Georgia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:06 am
Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Court of Appeal “A local planning authority could not bring enforcement proceedings against the unlawful construction of a dwelling house on a farm in breach of planning permission which was granted for the purpose of erecting a barn. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:04 pm
Reading Barnes v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 9:06 pm
Ebbert v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:26 am
means new bad law.United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
MySpace, Barnes v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 7:25 pm
The land included a house and a dairy barn. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 8:16 pm
On December 11, 2014, Perschbacher applied to the county for a CUP to construct on the land a barn capable of housing 2,490 swine. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:17 pm
Tony Gardner, the operator of the Festival of Fears, submitted an application to operate a haunted house inside a pole barn on Thorpe Farm; however, the permit was denied because the barn was less than 150 feet from Stoneybrook Road, which would require a zoning variance as set forth in an October 2007 Amendment to the Joint Municipal Zoning Ordinance (“JMZO”). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The brief supporting the petition for rehearing was filed in Barnes v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 12:31 pm
October 30, 2008): [*P15] More importantly, even if Barnes had not consented, the deputies still would have been allowed to look inside the house for Scott because they had an active arrest warrant for Scott and a reasonable belief that he lived in the house. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 11:59 am
US v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:14 pm
Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. [read post]
California Court of Appeal allows plaintiff to bring willful FCRA claims as class action before jury
26 Apr 2022, 6:56 am
In Hebert v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Barnes and Figueroa v. [read post]
