Search for: "Barnes v. Richardson" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2011, 9:45 am by AdminLaw Blogger
From the Customs Law blog of Lawrence Friedman (Barnes/Richardson, Chicago), "Hold the Mayo". [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:55 am
On his Customs Law blog, Larry Friedman (Barnes/Richardson, Chicago) discusses Schick v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:21 pm
In "CAFC Remands Broker Penalty Case" on his Customs Law blog, Chicago attorney Lawrence Friedman (Barnes/Richardson) describes a recent Federal Circuit opinion (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:47 pm by AdminLaw Blogger
I recommend the Customs Law blog post "Learning Moments" by Lawrence Friedman of Barnes/Richardson (Chicago). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 3:03 pm
As Larry Friedman (Barnes/Richardson, Chicago) points out on his Customs Law blog, referring to Monday's SCOTUS decision in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who reports that Sotomayor said she “looked forward to a nomination that will restore the court to full strength. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:42 pm by Howard Bashman
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court says crisis pregnancy centers do not have to provide women abortion information. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:48 am by Vivian Persand
The Supreme Court of Alabama addressed a number of bad faith issues in its decision on Jones v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
The court held that RLUIPA does not authorize a claim for damages in a suit against the warden in his official capacity.In Richardson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Larry
When I was a young whippersnapper customs lawyer, there were several at Barnes, Richardson & Colburn where I worked and continue to work. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, former State Department consular officer Christopher Richardson casts doubt on the validity of the visa-waiver process the government has relied to defend its position in Trump v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:12 pm
Richardson, 2008 BCSC 1349 at para. 84. [read post]