Search for: "Barnett v. Barnett" Results 1 - 20 of 1,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 9:46 am by Josh Wright
” (same) I’ll take Barnett (2006-08) over Barnett (2011) in a technical knockout. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 9:00 am by Howard Wasserman
Barrett pointed out last week, next year is the 75th anniversary of West Virginia Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am by tracey
Regina v Barnett; [2011] EWCA Crim 2936;  [2011] WLR (D)  385 “In relation to proceedings in which a defendant’s benefit from general criminal conduct was assessed the court was ‘entitled’ to make the assumptions provided for in section 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 even if the prosecution had not given the written preliminary notice provided for in section 71(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm by Howard Wasserman
Today is the 70th anniversary of West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Metric Marketing
The post Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital appeared first on WKW. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 7:48 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Self-defense and involuntary manslaughter The appellant, Antonio Barnett, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County by a jury, presided over by Judge Robin D. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Brady violation — Impeachment evidence Appellant Frank Barnett was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of wear, carry, and transport of a handgun on person; possession of a regulated firearm; and conspiracy to wear, carry, and transport a handgun on person. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:47 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury instructions — Murder After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Tavon Barnett, appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder, three counts of first-degree assault, and four counts of use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 7:40 am by Unreported Opinions
The cover was loose and when Barnett stepped on it, it moved and her leg fell into the hole beneath, causing injury. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm by Michael Perry
The Individual Mandate, Sovereignty, and the Ends of Good Government: A Reply to Professor Randy Barnett Patrick McKinley Brennan Villanova University School of Law University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2011 Abstract:Randy Barnett has recently argued that the individual mandate is unconstitutional because it is an improper regulation under the Necessary and Proper Clause (in conjunction with the Commerce Clause) because it improperly "commandeers" the people and thereby… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:37 pm by Howard Wasserman
Barrett reminds us that next June is the 75th anniversary of West Virginia Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Tags: Article V, Cato Institute, constitutional law Randy Barnett, “Our Republican Constitution” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Andrew Hamm
In contrast, Barnett pointed to the Court’s 1896 decision in Plessy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:55 pm
Here is the abstract:The Supreme Court has recently held in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 2:49 am
Barnett v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another; [2009] WLR(D) 107 “The general rule in construing planning permission which was clear and unambiguous, to have regard only to the permission unless the planning application had been expressly incorporated, applied to outline planning permission. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:26 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The author defends the proposition that the Court in Lochner v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:18 am
Barnett v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Court of Appeal “Where full planning permission had been granted for the construction of buildings, the grant approved the application plans and drawings unless the permission expressly stated otherwise. [read post]