Search for: "Barnhart v. Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2018, 2:05 pm
Interpretation (statute): Rule of the last antecedent:(Fn. 6) The classic example comes from Barnhart v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:29 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court’s decision in AT&T v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26 (2003) (adopting a construction that is “quite sensible as a matter of grammar”) (citation omitted). [read post]
Supreme Court case stating that past relevant work does not have to exist in substantial numbers; see Barnhart v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:31 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
 as modifying only the noun or phrase that it immediately follows,” Barnhart v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
Another review of Bill Barnhart’s and Gene Schlickman’s forthcoming biography of John Paul Stevens is at the Christian Science Monitor. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
 And ACSblog posts a piece by Bill Barnhart, co-author of a forthcoming biography on Justice Stevens. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]