Search for: "Barocas v Barocas" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Neil Cahn
That is one lesson to be learned from a split-decision of the Appellate Division First Department in its April 17, 2012 decision in Barocas v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The term “disparate impact” was first used in the 1971 Supreme Court case Griggs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
First Department Holds Although Husband Retained All the Property, Court Will Not Set Aside Agreement on Ground of Unconscionability Where Inequitable Conduct Lacking                                                              In Barocas v Barocas, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1293783 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]