Search for: "Barrett v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,808
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2023, 7:16 am by SCOTUSblog
Vázquez, Transnational Litigation Blog) The post The morning read for Tuesday, August 29 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
In Nebraska, Amy Coney Barrett wrote separately to condemn the stronger version of the MQD. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Influencers like Isabella Barrett, 15, are worth millions for “livin the life girl! [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
Fifth, Justice Alito said nothing at all about the judicial philosophies of Justices Barrett or Kavanaugh. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
If you want a wonderful summary of the inanity of Thomas' opinion, here's a piece for you.In Biden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am by Guest Author
” That’s why it was so significant that Justice Barrett authored a concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Katherine Shaw
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]