Search for: "Barrett v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:38 am by James Romoser
Adams, a First Amendment case about whether Delaware can choose its state judges based on party affiliation, and Texas v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am by Eric Goldman
The court says knowledge is irrelevant to Section 230 (cites to Barrett and Jones v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair… [read post]