Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
For example, United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:05 pm
In the case of Barrett V. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court in United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:22 pm
Doctor's Data, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:28 am
Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:05 am
Dawn Barrett v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:35 pm
On June 3, 2009, in the case of Barrett v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 12:29 pm
In State of Tennessee v Mimi Barrett , The Court of Criminal Appeals ruled on Ms .Barrett’s appeal of her sentence. [read post]
22 May 2020, 12:29 pm
In State of Tennessee v Mimi Barrett , The Court of Criminal Appeals ruled on Ms .Barrett’s appeal of her sentence. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:53 am
” Acting on a September 17 petition filed by the Pennsylvania Democratic Party, the four Democrats on the state’s seven-member high court rewrote a significant portion of the state’s election law, extending the statutory deadlines for postmarked ballots. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:42 am
Barrett, St. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:42 am
Barrett, St. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
United States</i> and <i>Nance v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 10:54 am
[With Justice Barrett joining Justice Kagan, does Dunn v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
At that point, Justice Barrett "switch[ed] gears" to talk about state standing. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:19 am
(Without comment, the court this week also denied a second case on the same issue, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Dalberiste v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
" Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an "officer of the United States" for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
