Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
The Barrett v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Amy Coney Barrett worked on the briefing for Bush v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
Also: Seth Barrett Tilman's brief in LeBrant v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In dissent by himself, Justice Thomas did make originalist arguments but Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Alito did not join him.2021-2022:In Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:16 pm
In particular, NAGR and Bevis pointed to the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:56 am
In Barrett v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:15 am
Barrett, 208 W.Va. 706, 542 S.E.2d 869 (2000)). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman]. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
Nonetheless, Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm
Contrary to the presumption underlying the Court's approach to vacatur under United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
There is an ongoing debate over whether the MQD is a substantive canon that serves separation of powers or simply a tool of ordinary statutory interpretation, as Justice Barrett argued in her concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
