Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 7:55 am
Barrett, the fifth vote to uphold the California law, wrote that she was joining this part of the opinion but not the substantial burden part. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:03 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman analyzed various arguments for Trump’s motion to move the New York State prosecution against him to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
Only Justices Thomas and Barrett fully agreed with him on that point. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
After NPCC v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
S. 267, 279 (1978), and "try novel social and economic experiments" if they wish, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:23 am
The case that came out this morning is National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
BARRETT, J., filed an opinion concurring in part. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
As they note, there were only six states with bans last year when New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
However, where, as here, the agency "fails to inform the person [or entity] making the FOIL request that further administrative review of the determination is available, the requirement of exhaustion [of administrative remedies] is excused (Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738, Matter of Barrett v Morgenthau, 74 NY2d 907; [see Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648]; 7. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
However, where, as here, the agency "fails to inform the person [or entity] making the FOIL request that further administrative review of the determination is available, the requirement of exhaustion [of administrative remedies] is excused (Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738, Matter of Barrett v Morgenthau, 74 NY2d 907; [see Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648]; 7. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The current Supreme Court has at least three members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:42 pm
At least following Bush v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
