Search for: "Barrett v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The argument that the United States made is: “Look, to the extent that Idaho doesn’t allow doctors to provide the kind of stabilizing care that EMTALA requires them to provide, the federal statute trumps the state law, and the Idaho law has to fall. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm by Shane Pennington
United States Department of Labor continued the Fifth Circuit’s exploration of agency authority under Loper Bright. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am by Norman L. Eisen
United States — and when and how to apply the tests the Supreme Court ordered her to administer. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:45 am by Lawrence Solum
However, a closely related question was addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Powell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 7:36 am by Michael C. Dorf
Bd. of Governors, but Justice Gorsuch criticized it last year in his concurrence in the judgment in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:29 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Seth Barrett Tillman (National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law) has posted What We Did and Did Not Argue in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The NCC's podcast on "The Constitutional Legacy of Watergate" is here.Lawbook Exchange’s August 2024 catalogue of Scholarly Law & Legal History is here.Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman explain What [They] Did and Did Not Argue in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 4:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Brackeen, the Supreme Court returned to the foundational question of federal authority over relations between the United States and Native nations, long known as “Indian affairs. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Perry (same-sex marriage) Joined blue state amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am by Josh Blackman
His resignation came shortly after the Supreme Court unanimously decided United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Kate Shaw
United States—a case about the sweep of a federal law aimed at public corruption; state supreme courts, such as the Colorado Supreme Court that ruled that President Trump could not appear on the state’s ballot after having engaged in insurrection; and administrative law judges at the SEC—Justice Gorsuch said that “the title ‘judge’ in this context is not quite what it might seem. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 1:51 pm by Guest Author
  The lower courts dismissed the claim on the grounds that it was barred under the APA’s statute of limitations, which requires that claims against the United States be brought “within six years after the right of action first accrues”. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:06 am by Seth Davis
Under that precedent, the analysis was simple: “Here, DHS authorized certain nonimmigrants to work in the United States—just like in Washtech. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:56 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
In the United States, free speech is first and foremost a negative right of individuals against the government as reflected in the state action doctrine. [read post]