Search for: "Barrett v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:03 am by Daniel Barry
On December 12, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (“Tenth Circuit”) denied en banc hearing to the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma in Pharmacy Care Management Association v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Contrary to the presumption underlying the Court's approach to vacatur under United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
There is an ongoing debate over whether the MQD is a substantive canon that serves separation of powers or simply a tool of ordinary statutory interpretation, as Justice Barrett argued in her concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
United States, involving whether juries must make the determination whether qualifying predicate offenses “were committed on occasions different from one another” under the Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing enhancement scheme. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm by Josh Blackman
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]